step one. But really, inside the genealogy, we all knowthat for each laws there’s an exception to this rule. A good vexing area ofgenealogy would be the fact no-one extremely understands how to apply brand new exclusions orrules having one decisive adjective including constantly, possibly, most likely,more than likely, etcetera. It would be interesting if the indeed there most other advice ofjointures being produced a-year otherwise two shortly after a known relationships big date.
dos. Is there an enthusiastic extant dispensation towards the wedding away from ElizabethClifford and you may Sir Ralph Bowes who had been 3rd cousins via Henry Fitzhugh,3rd Lord Fitzhugh or 4th cousins, immediately following removed from the brand new 5th LordClifford? Who would narrow down its wedding big date.
Arthur
Allegedly, in the event that a dispensation try desired and you will provided, it can havebeen of the among the many after the, and may come in brand new correspondingregister book, whether or not it survives:
Thomas Savage, Archbishop from York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop of Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop of York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop out-of Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop away from Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop out-of Carlisle 1502-1508John Cent, Bishop off Carlisle 1509-1520
5. In the event the tenth Lord Clifford really does wed at the beginning of 1487 [state January] andhas Age afterwards in that seasons, really does the fresh chronology maybe not works?
John fingers?
Elizabeth created in the late 1487, Henry produced inside 1488/nine, Joan inside ,etc. filling in the names of the upload out of . In the event that (a) thechronology nevertheless really works; and (b) their own relationship section was not lower; thenwe only have the fresh new 1505 pedigree of Henry VII’s that’s when you look at the oppositionto the fresh new conjecture you to definitely she is a valid child.
six. About your 1505 pedigree: Could be the Clifford daughters new onlyknown Henry VII relations excluded? Were there someone else? In that case,won’t one to reflect improperly on this file given that a resource?
Out-of reviews We have produced from the fresh new c.1505 Henry VII Affairs pedigreeswith the fresh new 1480-1500 Visitation of the North pedigrees, which are
From the c.1505 Connections pedigrees, the fresh Clifford children are not listedin a Clifford pedigree, but instead regarding the St. John pedigree. As I’mnot accustomed the new St. John household members, after the ‘s the guidance asit seems regarding the c.1505 pedigree, since taken from brand new 1834 Coll. Better. etGen. blog post. New phrasing into the quotations is precisely because it appears inthe 1834 post (pp. 310-311).
“No. XII.”Away from my Lord Welles daughter, Sir Richard Rod, Domme Verney, SirJohn St. John, together with other.”f.288, 296, 317, 318.”Margaret Duchess out-of Somerset got around three husbands.” From the “John Duke ofSomerset” she got “My personal Lady the fresh King’s Mother.” that has “The newest Queen.” whohad “Prince “By the “Sir Oliver Saint John, very first spouse.” she had 3 daus & dos sons:
A beneficial. “Edith, married to help you Geoffrey Pole off Buckinghamshire.” They had:A1. “Sir Richard Pole, Knt. married toward Woman Margaret, dau. from theDuke from Clarence.” That they had: “Harry. “A2. “Alianor, married to help you Ralph Verney, Esq.” They’d: “John Verney.—– [youngster, unnamed]. ——-[a new youngster, unnamed].”
B. “John Ssint John, esq.” He previously five pupils:B1. “Sir John Saint John, Knight.” who’d “Four daughters and you will oneson.”B2. “Anne, wedd. to Harry Lord Clifford.” They had “Jane. Mabill.Henry, child and you will heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.”B3. “Age, wedded so you’re able to Thomas Kent, Esq. out of Lincolnshire.”B4. “An effective Nun away from Shaftesbury.”B5. “Oliver Saint John.”
C. “Dame Mary, wedded to help you Sir Richard Frognall.” That they had:C1. “Edmond Frognall and his brethren and you will sistren.” Having issueindicated, however entitled.C2. “E, married so you can Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.”
D. “Age, wedded basic into Lord Zouche; immediately following on the LordScrope away from Bolton.” Issue:D1. [by the Zouche] ” Catesby.” They had:”Elizabeth. George. John. William.”D2. [because of the Scrope] ” Conyers.” Having issueindicated however called.
Margaret Duchess out-of Somerset, by “Lionel Lord Welles, history partner.”had: “John Viscount Welles, wedded Cecily, dau. away from K. Edward IV.” andthey had “E.”